Description

Kelly and Sullivan - Criminal Case Attorneys

Kelly and Sullivan was established in 1990. Their practice includes Criminal Defense, Federal Criminal Defense,
Drug Charges, Trafficking, Warrants, Domestic Violence, Domestic Battery, Battery, Driving Under the Influence, Personal Injury, Civil Litigation and Wills.
 

KEVIN M. KELLY, ESQ.

EDUCATION
Mount Saint Mary's College, Emmitsburg, Maryland, 1973, Bachelor of Science (Cum Laude)
New England School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts, 1978, Doctor of Jurisprudence
MILITARY
United States Army, Military Intelligence 1966-1977, Captain
TRAINING SCHOOLS
Army Security Agency; Area Intelligence Officer's Course; Military Intelligence Advance
Course; Defense Language Institute (Vietnamese); Ranger, and Airborne Schools.
TOURS OF DUTY
Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand
DECORATIONS
Bronze Star Medal; Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster; Army Commendation with "V"
Device; Joint Service Commendation Medal; Meritorious Service Medal; and Air Medal
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
Daily "black book" briefing of the U.S. Ambassador in Laos and Cambodia involving world wide
political, economic and military unrest. Weekly briefings to the "country team" concerning
military activities in Laos and Cambodia. Co-authored a classified treatis entitled "Future
Intelligence Collection Activities for Laos".
EMPLOYMENT
Personnel Specialist, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 1977-1978,
Judicial Law Clerk, Clark County, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department One, 1978-1979
Attorney at Law, Las Vegas, Nevada 1979-Present
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
Supreme Judicial Court, Massachusetts, 1978
Nevada Supreme Court, 1979
United States District Court, Nevada, 1979
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1981
United States Supreme Court, 1983
United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, 1995
United States District Court, Western District of Texas 2001
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING/SCHOOLS
Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Negotiation, 2001
Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Advanced Negotiation Workshops, 2001
National College of Advocacy, Stanford University, California 1986
National College of Criminal Defense, El Paso, Texas 1980
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
American Bar Association
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
American Trial Lawyer Association
Nevada Bar Association
Massachusetts Bar Association
Nevada Trial Lawyer Association
Clark County Bar Association
California Defenders Association
American Judicature Society
American Civil Liberties Union
Nevada Attorney's For Criminal Justice
First Amendment Lawyers Association
ABA Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities
TEACHING POSITIONS
Clark County Community College, Las Vegas, Nevada
1979-1981, Real Estate Law Instructor
University of Nevada at Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada
1978-1979, Business Law Instructor (Substitute)
JUDICIAL POSITIONS
Eighth Judicial District Court, Las Vegas, Nevada
1979-1982; Master, Paternity Proceedings.
Eighth Judicial District Court, Las Vegas, Nevada
1979-1982; Alternate Master, Child Support Proceedings
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
National Conference of Christians and Jews, Las Vegas, Nevada 1987
"Drug Testing: Yes or No.?"
National Conference of Christians and Jews, Las Vegas, Nevada 1989
"Curfew on the Strip: Do Teenagers Have Rights?"
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Las Vegas, Nevada 2002 "Management Strategies for Dealing with a Diverse Workforce."
ACTIVITIES
Member, Board of Directors, The Problem Gambling Center, 2001-present
Member, Board of Directors, National Conference of Community Justice, 2000-2003
Member, Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada, Committee on Moral Character and Fitness, 1998 - present
Vice Chair, Advisory Committee on Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Citizen Review Board, 1998 - 1999
Chair, Nevada Supreme Court Committee to Implement Recommendations to Eliminate Racial, Economic and Gender Bias in the Justice System, 1998 - 1999
Panel Member, Key Ethical Issues for Criminal Defense Lawyers, Sponsored by the Federal Public Defender, July 12, 1995
Criminal Justice Act District Representative, District of Nevada, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1995 - 1997
Member, United States District Court, District of Nevada
Criminal Justice Act Committee 1994 - present
Chair, Nevada Supreme Court of Nevada Task Force for the Study of Racial and Economic Bias in the Justice System 1993 - 1997
Chair, Membership Committee, Nevada Attorney's for Criminal Justice 1994
Lobbyist, Nevada Legislature
Nevada Attorney's for Criminal Justice 1993
Chair, Legislative Committee, Nevada Attorney's for Criminal Justice 1993
Panel Member, Nevada American Inn of Court (A Criminal Law Ethics Panel) 1993
Member, Board of Directors, Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice 1989 - 1994
Chair, Amicus Curiae Committee, Nevada Attorney's for Criminal Justice 1989-1992
Panel member, National Bicentennial Competition on the Constitution and Bill of Rights 1989, 1991, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2001
Member of the Criminal Justice Section, American Bar Association 1989, 1990
Panel Judge, Sierra Nevada National Forensic League, 1988
Fee Dispute Committee, Nevada State Bar 1987-1993
Organizing member, Political Action Committee Nevadans for Human Rights 1983-1984
PUBLICATIONS
Nevada Lawyer , January 1998, Task Force Studies Racial and Economic Bias in the Justice System
Nevada Lawyer , January 1998, Status of the Task Force: Agenda for Future Research
Nevada Public Affairs Review , 1996, Racial and Economic Issues in the Justice System: A Nevada Task Force
Nevada Lawyer , January 1993, The 1993 Legislature from a Criminal Defense Attorney's Perspective

SEAN P. SULLIVAN, ESQ..

EDUCATION
Western High School - Las Vegas, Nevada
University of Nevada Reno, 1989 Bachelor of Science Degree - Criminal Justice
California School of Law, San Diego California, 1993 Doctor of Jurisprudence
EMPLOYMENT
1991-1992 - Externship, United States District Court - District of Nevada, Honorable Philip M. Pro Las Vegas, Nevada
1993-1994 - Associate Counsel, Kevin M. Kelly, Ltd. Las Vegas, Nevada
1994-Present Managing Partner, Kelly & Sullivan, Ltd. Las Vegas, Nevada
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
Nevada State Bar
Nevada Supreme Court
United States District Court, District of Nevada
Admitted Pro Hac Vice:
California
Hawaii
Arizona
Colorado
Utah
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
Getting Tough on DWI: The Defense 1995 Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice
Las Vegas, Nevada, 1995
Second National Seminar on Forensic Evidence
and the Criminal Law Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts New Orleans, Louisiana, 2002
DUI: Point/Counterpoint State Bar of Nevada - Las Vegas, Nevada, 2002
Jury Selection and Trial Advocacy in Nevada- Lorman Education Services,
Las Vegas,Nevada 2004
Warriors for Defense National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers New York City,
New York, 2005
9 th Annual DUI Seminar Under the Microscope: Beating DUI’s with Science
Las Vegas, Nevada, 2005
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
Nevada Bar Association
Clark County Bar Association
Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice
Nevada Trial Lawyers Association
Minnesota Attorneys for Criminal Justice
National Bar Association

Attorneys Kevin M. Kelly and Sean P. Sullivan, have been practicing criminal defense law for a combined total of 28 years. Kevin M. Kelly moved to Las Vegas from Boston in 1980 to pursue his career and Sean Sullivan was born and raised in Las Vegas. Our Motto is -

"Sometimes Justice Needs a Little Help."

THERE IS A SIMPLE REASON THAT KEVIN M. KELLY AND SEAN P. SULLIVAN
ARE AMONGST AMERICA’S TOP DUI & DWI DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: THEY ARE PROFESSIONALS

Call now to discuss your Las Vegas Nevada DUI DWI drunk driving case

Nevada DUI Laws are some of the toughest in the country. Quickly obtaining a
Las Vegas Nevada DUI attorney, a Las Vegas Nevada DWI attorney, or a Las Vegas
Nevada drunk driving lawyer to review your case is extremely important! Please
complete a FREE DUI case review and submit it as soon as possible, and we will
have Kelly & Sullivan, Ltd. Contact you immediately.

Because within as little as 10 days of you arrest you may automatically lose your
drivers license and even your entire case by delaying your decision to hire an
attorney, we strongly recommend that you complete a FREE DUI CASE REVIEW
immediately.

Click here for a free case review!

Drunk Driving/DUI - An Overview

The crime of drunk driving is also known as "driving under the influence," or DUI, and "driving while intoxicated," or DWI. In some states, the crime may be known as "operating while intoxicated, or OWI, or "operating under the influence," or OUI. The names vary according to how state laws refer to or define the crime. Whatever the name, the state laws all have a common aim of punishing those who drive while under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs. A drunk driving conviction carries with it serious and long-lasting consequences: jail or prison time, a heavy fine, and suspension or revocation of a driver's license. A person who is facing a drunk driving charge should not hesitate to seek immediate legal counsel from an experienced drunk driving defense attorney.

Drunk Driving: Elements of the Offense

No matter what the name of the crime might be-DUI, DWI, OUI, or OWI-the first element of the crime is "driving," or "operating," a motor vehicle. This language is intended to describe the level of physical control a person has over the motor vehicle. In many states, operating or driving does not require that the vehicle actually be in motion, or even that the engine be running. A person who is found sitting behind the wheel of a car may be convicted of driving or operating the car while under the influence. Courts have even convicted people sitting behind the wheel of a car while it is being towed. Passengers are seldom considered operators or drivers unless they grab the steering wheel.

As used in the drunk driving laws, the term "vehicle" is defined more broadly than just "motor vehicle." Usually, a "vehicle" is defined as anything that carries people or goods. A "motor vehicle" is something powered by a motor or engine. Either term can include cars, trucks, even motorboats. Most laws draw a distinction between inoperable vehicles and those that are only immobile-capable of moving, but not moving at the time. Legal distinctions such as this are one reason you need an experienced drunk driving defense attorney to give your case the careful analysis needed.

Another element of a drunk driving charge is the location of the offense. Older drunk driving laws often included limiting phrases, such as "on the public highways of the state." Many judges relied on that language to conclude that the drunk driving laws did not apply to someone driving on private property, including parking lots. Modern laws, however, require only proof that the offense took place within the boundaries of the state.

Proof of a Drunk Driving Charge

Drunk driving laws are intended to prevent the operation of a powerful and potentially dangerous machine when the operator cannot be in adequate control. Intoxication is shown in one of two ways: (1) a blood alcohol level in excess of a certain amount, or (2) proving that the driver or operator was impaired from the use of alcohol or illegal drugs. The first method is the method preferred by prosecutors. The proof does not rely on anyone's observation or judgment of someone's behavior, but depends solely on the results of a blood alcohol test. Laws often require a person who is suspected of driving while drunk or using illegal drugs to give a sample of his or her blood or breath for chemical testing purposes. These laws are known as "implied consent" laws, because they provide that by operating a motor vehicle, the driver has given his or her consent to such a test. When a sample is taken, it is analyzed by a machine to determine the concentration of alcohol in a person's blood. The maximum blood alcohol level varies from state to state. For many years, the most common maximum level was .10 percent, but most states have now lowered the level to .08. Any driver or operator who has a blood alcohol level over the legal limit is considered legally intoxicated. The results of the test are usually considered conclusive, and can be challenged only by showing that the test failed for a reason such as faulty or malfunctioning test equipment, improper sampling, faulty preservation of the sample, or (in the case of a breath test) a foreign object in the mouth when the test was conducted.

Impairment may also be proven by the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident for which the driver was stopped or arrested. These facts and circumstances include observations of the driver by eyewitnesses, statements made by the driver or operator, and circumstantial evidence (for example, evidence that a defendant left a bar after being inside for several hours). The inquiry focuses on whether the defendant's ability to drive was impaired. Law enforcement officers have a number of standard tests for impairment, done at the time a driver is stopped, known as "field sobriety tests." These tests include walking a straight line by placing one foot directly in front of the other, holding one's arms straight out at the sides and touching the nose with closed eyes, counting backwards, and reciting the alphabet. Other evidence of impairment may include a law enforcement officer's observation of the defendant's driving, which probably was the reason the driver was stopped in the first place. Conduct such as driving too fast or too slowly, weaving across lanes, and going through stop signs or stoplights may be considered evidence of a driver's impairment. Drivers often will tell an officer who stops them that they have been drinking, how much they've had to drink, and when they had it. Such statements may also be evidence of impairment.

Drunk Driving Penalties

In the last twenty years, the penalties for drunk driving have become far more severe than they were in the past. First-time offenders face potential jail time and fines, although often the penalty for a first-time offense will be something less than jail time in exchange for a guilty plea. Repeat offenders are usually treated more harshly, with substantial fines and mandatory jail sentences that may not be suspended or waived by the court. State administrative regulations often call for the suspension or revocation of a defendant's driver's license, in addition to any criminal penalty. Defendants have sometimes tried to make the argument that this administrative suspension is double jeopardy prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, but these arguments have never succeeded.

Conclusion

A drunk driving charge is a serious criminal charge. Most of us rely on the ability to drive to do many everyday things, such as getting to work, buying groceries, and transporting family members to activities like lessons, medical appointments, and school. A person who is charged with drunk driving stands an excellent chance of losing his or her driving privileges either temporarily or permanently, and also runs the risk of suffering more severe consequences, such as a fine or a jail sentence. If you have been accused of a drunk driving offense, contact an experienced drunk driving defense attorney immediately. You cannot afford not to have expert counsel on your side.

Frequently Asked Questions about Drunk Driving/DUI

Q: What is "blood alcohol level"?

A: Blood alcohol level (BAC) is a term used to describe the level of alcohol in the bloodstream of a person arrested for drunk driving. It is used in court as evidence of that offense. The most common method of determining BAC is through a breath test, although blood and urine testing is done in some instances. If the level is found to be at or over .10, or .08 in some states, the test results can establish a presumption of impairment.

Q: Can I refuse a Breathalyzer?

A: Although the answer can vary by state, in many cases, a refusal is itself a criminal violation subject to stiff penalties. In addition, if the case against you is proven, there may be additional penalties for the refusal, above and beyond those for the drunk driving offense.

Q: Are breath test results always accurate?

A: Some courts allow the defendant in a drunk driving case to challenge the scientific accuracy of Breathalyzer tests in general, whereas others may allow challenges based on the particular circumstances of a test, such as improperly calibrated equipment or inadequately trained officers. If the test results are inadmissible or can be challenged, the case will have to be proven based on other evidence, such as eyewitness testimony and field-sobriety test results.

Q: What if I lose my license but continue to drive?

A: If a person whose license has been revoked or suspended due to drunk driving chooses to drive without a valid license and is pulled over, he or she stands to suffer more serious consequences, including fines and imprisonment. The more prudent course of action is to rely on friends and family for rides or use public transportation.

Q: How can I get automobile insurance after a drunk driving conviction?

A: Although your rates will likely be higher, your insurer may continue to insure you even after a conviction. A subsequent clean driving record will result in lower rates in the future. If your insurer drops you as a result of the conviction, another insurance company may be willing to accept the risk. In fact, some companies specialize in offering insurance to drivers who have been convicted of drunk driving, but the rates are much higher.

Q: What is the punishment for drunk driving?

A: Drunk driving carries serious penalties. Although the court may go easier on first-time offenders, even in first-offense cases the possible sentences include stiff fines and jail time. If the circumstances warrant it, however, the court may choose less restrictive options, including probation, community service, or alcohol awareness or abuse counseling.. For subsequent offenses, the likelihood of imprisonment increases, and in all cases, the loss of driving privileges-at least temporarily-is almost guaranteed.

Q: How can I get to work if I can't drive?

A: Many drunk driving offenders are forced to rely on public transportation or rides from friends and family for transportation to and from work during periods of license suspension or revocation. In some cases, offenders may be granted a "hardship license," allowing them to drive just to and from work. However, if an offender is caught driving outside of those strict limitations, further penalties will be imposed.

Q: What is the best way to beat a drunk driving charge?

A: The best way to avoid being convicted of drunk driving is to not drink and drive. Use a designated driver, call a taxi, call a friend, or don't drink alcohol if you are going to need to drive within a few hours. For some people, even one drink can impair their driving abilities. Remember, after having a few drinks is not the time to decide whether you are capable of driving. However, if you have been charged with driving under the influence, an experienced drunk driving defense lawyer can work to improve the outcome of your case.

Q: If I simply intend to plead guilty, why do I need a lawyer?

A: Even if you are guilty of drunk driving, it is imperative that you seek the advice of experienced counsel so that you can minimize your sentence and maximize your opportunities to move ahead toward a brighter future. Criminal defense attorneys are needed to equalize the balance of power between the defendant and the prosecution and to ensure that the constitutional rights that are guaranteed to all criminal defendants are preserved.

Domestic violence is a violent confrontation that occurs between family members or between people who live together or between people in a dating relationship. It can happen between a father and daughter/son, mother and daughter/son, an adult child and elderly parent, but it most often occurs between a man and a woman living together, married or not. Sometimes weapons are used, sometimes property is damaged, but most often the physical violence increases in frequency and level over time.

Why were charges filed?

The police officers, who responded to the place where the incident occurred, believed that a crime had been committed.

If the police officers believed that a battery had been committed they must make a police report for the incident. If possible, the officers must also arrest the person who they believe battered another person within 24 hours of the battery. That person must spend a minimum of 12 hours in jail before he/she can be released.

If the officers are not able to arrest the person who they believe committed a domestic battery, they must submit appropriate paperwork to the LVMPD Domestic Violence Unit. Detectives review the reports and evidence and may submit the case for possible prosecution.

Other police reports such as; violation of protective orders, destruction of private property, stalking or harassment, may also be submitted to the LVMPD Domestic Violence detectives for evidence review and possible prosecution.

Misdemeanor or felony.

Generally, if the battery involved a weapon (such as a knife or gun) or the injuries did not result in permanent physical damage, then the crime against the Defendant is classified as a misdemeanor. The maximum possible penalty for a misdemeanor is $1,000.00 fine and/or 180 days in jail.

Misdemeanors that occur within the city of Las Vegas are prosecuted by the City Attorney’s Office. Batteries with weapons or serious injury are felonies. The Clark County District Attorney’s Office prosecutes all felony cases and any misdemeanor cases that occur outside of the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson, Boulder City and Mesquite.

Testifying in court:

A person only has to testify in court if you receive a subpoena ordering you to appear in court to testify in a trial.

Dropping charges:

You are not the one who filed charges. The District Attorney, the City Attorney and NRS prohibit dismissal unless the prosecutor is unable to prove the defendant guilty of committing the crime.

 

 

Kelly and Sullivan - Criminal Case Attorneys Photos

Reviews

Let's Discuss! Join the Conversation!

Leave a Review

Rating:
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Close
Please login to view this content.

Forgot your password?New Signup